Homily

General, Homilies, Soul Food

30th Sunday in Ordinary Time

ā€œGod created human beings to praise, reverence and serve God and by doing this, to save their souls.ā€ Anyone who has made the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius will recognize that right away as the preliminary prayer of the Saint or what he calls the first principle and foundation. I have to admit though that when I first encountered that, I was taken aback and misunderstood it. I reacted negatively. I thought, this God of Ignatius was so needful of attention. He created human beings just so they can praise, worship and serve him like slaves. Isn’t he being too narcissistic, too egoistic and too self-referential. Of course, now I know better. As they say, I am older and wiser. I remember all this, my initial incursions into the spiritual exercises, because of the Gospel we’ve read today. Jesus tells us that the greatest commandment is to love God with everything we’ve got. And the second one is to love our neighbor as we love ourselves. Like many, I have had no problem with the second one. As a social activist in my youth, I have always advocated for love of neighbor in terms of social justice, basic services for the poor, human rights, etc. And as for the first one, the greatest commandment, I have always seen it from the viewpoint of the second one. You love God whom you do not see in your neighbor whom you see. But a Jesuit early on corrected me. No. You have to take on God separately. Yes, you find him in his creatures but he is more than your neighbor and creation. You seek him out in prayer, in silence, in the Bible, in the sacraments, in his daily engagements with you. And so, as Jesus tells us today, you have to love God, as he is, for who he is, in himself. That is settled. God is an entity unto himself, and must be reckoned with, as it were, in his own terms. But still I struggle with the order of priority. Why is loving him the greatest of all commandments. In other words, why should he go first? Why should we love him first? I have a friend. He got married to a beautiful and loving wife and they had three children. I had never seen him so happy, so contented with his life. And he would say that literally. He had a perfect wife, a perfect life. Admittedly though, God was not part of that life, except for the routinary Sunday mass. He was never spiritual or religious, but he was nonetheless a very kind and generous person. But one day, his wife got terribly sick, and in just a few months, passed away. My friend understandably went through depression; but when I spoke with him after some time, he said, only when his wife had passed away that he discovered God, that life was this enormous mystery bigger than himself, his wife, his family, and at the center of all of that is God. He thought life ended when he lost his wife; but it continued, life, love continued. Because God remains, he said. What my friend discovered or realized is what philosophers have been telling us about God. God is the very ground of everything. He is being itself, life itself, beauty itself, love itself. And creatures like us only participate in God’s very life. And so to understand ourselves, our world, we must deal with him, with mystery. And that is the reason why he comes first. When Jesus tells us to love God first, it sounds a command, an order, a summons. In fact, as many of us know as we get older, he is merely sharing with us the deep truth about our lives. We love God first, because he is at the center, the core of our very lives, our very selves, our very existence. He is alpha and omega. He is not one other being competing for our love, but Being itself, life itself, love itself.   Homily delivered by Fr. Emmanuel “Nono” Alfonso, SJ 30th Sunday in Ordinary Time 29 October 2023 Cenacle Retreat House

General, Homilies, Soul Food

Cornerstone (Matthew 21:33-43)

You know how difficult it is to enter Ateneo, right? It’s legendary now. These past months, there’s been regular turnover of new guards at the gates. So, all faces are unfamiliar to them including ours, campus residents. So, whether we’re in a car or on foot, we also get stopped & scrutinized, understandably. It’s their job. They’re just doing what they’re ordered to do. But it can get exasperating, esp. when you’re in a rush. So, I confess, dear sisters & brothers, if with embarrassment, that when I was stopped at the gate a third time, I came this close to blurting out, ā€œAlam mo hijo, hindi ka pa pinapanganak, dito na ako nakatira,ā€ out of sheer exasperation. Or is it…out of entitlement? I think it’s fair to say that most of us are host to this lurking germ in our egos: the sense of entitlement. I’ve seen entitlement not just among the rich, by the way, but also among the poor; not just in bosses & administrators, but also down rank & file & union members; not just in lay communities, but also in religious congregations. It comes in differing degrees. There’s entitlement that’s fleeting & harmless. But there’s one that’s enduring, scheming, & nasty—a lifestyle. In first century Israel, there was no such thing as a ā€œJewish landownerā€ because Caesar owned Israel & all its lands. ā€œLandownersā€ were really Caesar’s cronies. They had to pay tribute to Caesar. So, they leased the lands to tenants & charged rent. To be chosen as a tenant was a huge blessing esp. at a time when Jews languished in poverty. A tenant earned not just a salary, but also a share in the harvest. For a master to leave his property to tenants was an act of enormous trust & empowerment. Pero ā€˜yun nga ang problema natin ā€˜di ba? With great power comes not just responsibility, but also entitlement. So, the tenants in today’s parable go from grateful to greedy, from blessed to malevolent to murderous, from untitled to entitled. Among many causes of entitlement today, the three most common I’ve seen are: (a) ā€œThis place & the people here owe me for bringing us all to where we are now;ā€ (b) ā€œI’m a survivor of humble & persecuted beginnings; I owe my success only to myself & to people loyal to me;ā€ & (c) ā€œI will never be bullied or poor or ugly again.ā€ As a result, the entitled believe they’re exempt from rules, from correction, from vows. They regard higher authority as also beholden to them. They groom yes-men to perpetuate their power. And worst of all, as they ingratiate themselves with patrons & benefactors, they scheme to silence their critics & quash perceived competitors. I guess, underneath the sense of entitlement lies the sense of ungratefulness. Kapag mapagpasalamat tayo, nakakaala tayo kung saan tayo galing noong tayo’y nabiyayaan. When we’re ungrateful, we forget. We forget what we basically & still share w/ everybody else: creaturehood, na tayong lahat nilalang ng Diyos, pero hindi tayo Diyos. Na lahat ng kabutihan, kayamanan, at kapangyarihang ikinagagalak natin at ipinagdiriwang natin ngayon, ang Diyos ang nagmamay-ari at nagkaloob, hindi tayo. Tayo’y pinahiraman lamang. Nangungupahan lamang, tenants. All power & position, plus the prestige, praises, & possessions along with them, may expiration date lahat ā€˜yan. Eventually, we’re x-ed: ex-president, ex-vice-president, ex-consultor, ex-fundraiser. How much people miss having us around, or how relieved they are that we’re finished & gone from their lives—that might be a good gauge of where we fall on the entitlement seismograph. Sisters & brothers, a cornerstone is a fascinating piece of architecture. For centuries, it was the first stone set in position before any construction of a temple, palace, or cathedral went underway. The cornerstone was once a huge, unshapely, quarried boulder. Then, it was carefully measured & painstakingly carved until a magnificently beautiful block emerged. The size & shape of the cornerstone determined the size & shape of the rest of the stones for building.Ā The cornerstone was placed with deliberate precision because it defined the orientation of the whole building. Artisans set cornerstones according to the advice of astrologers. They believed heavenly bodies regulated human life, fortune, & success; as well as failure, misfortune, & death. So, not only was the cornerstone structural & architectonic, it was mystical & prophetic. When the temple, palace, or cathedral is up & running, we don’t really pay much attention to the cornerstone anymore, do we? Oh, we marvel at memorial stone at the doorway, all shiny, ceremonial, & screaming, ā€œme, me, me.ā€ But the cornerstone? It sits in a corner outside, as it quietly carries all the weight, the orientation, the direction, & the history of everything that presses & bears upon it. How do we guard & restrain ourselves from being a self-absorbed, gaudy, entitled, imeldific memorial stone? Maybe we can beg our Father to always remind us of our Cornerstone. For upon his shoulders, he carries all our weight. From where he stands, sets our orientation. From where he walks, charts our course. From his rejection by the builders, his suffering & death, he retells our histories & heals them. So, if we really think about it, we actually don’t need much entitlement… any more than we’ve already been richly, constantly, lovingly blessed. And we already have a title. Mga anak ng Diyos; children of God.   Homily delivered by Fr. Arnel Aquino, SJ on the 27th Sunday in Ordinary Time 8 October 2023 Cenacle Retreat House

Features, Homilies, Soul Food

The Third and Fourth Sons in the Parable of the Two Sons

To Pray on and Ponder: Matthew 21, 28-32 In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus recounts the very short parable of two sons–one who seemed unfaithful in his words, but ultimately followed his father’s instruction, while the other seemed faithful in words and even quick to say “yes!” yet, ultimately did not obey the very words he said “yes” to. One may argue that the one who proved faithful was the son who carried out his fathers’ instructions despite the initial resistance. Yet I am moved to include the storyteller, Jesus among the sons we are called notice. And of course in Jesus, we find a third Son who is faithful both in word and in deed and in whose love we can incline our hearts so that by our loving contemplation of him, some of the fidelity and obedience may rub in on us. Well, if you wish, we can consider ourselves the fourth child. While the parable as a story recounts of two sons and their respective dispositions, the parable as narrative has the third son, Jesus, as the narrator of the parable who is the faithful one both in word and deed, and we, the narratees, the ones to whom Jesus addresses the parable now as the fourth child whose response has yet to come to light. In the first place, contemplating Jesus, we can learn trust and surrender. After all, people who would tend to resist at first instance and block off the deepening love relationship probably have things to defend or have need for a clear map on how to proceed where a genuine loving relationship have no clear maps to help us navigate. Trust and surrender asks from us a leap of faith, an opening to vulnerability with only the assurance that God loves and God cares to draw us and confirm us in a more complete self-gift. Secondly, contemplating Jesus, we can learn to befriend mystery and to open ourselves to a God who resists any form of reduction or idolatry. God draws us closer to Godself, yet he will resist any attempt from us to put him in a box so we may fully understand him and take a hold of him. God as Truth has made Godself knowable and accessible to us, yet not completely. As with the Greek’s notion of truth as “aletheia” God as Truth reveals Godself to us even as God hides Godself in dark mystery as well, so that even in finding God here and there, we thirst for more and continue seeking him out. There’s more to know about God and ourselves. Finally, contemplating Jesus, we can learn obedience through sacrifice. Alas, the self-gift and self-surrender are not without cost. We learn obedience by sacrifice. Our love deepens as our offering of self becomes more serious and of value and consequence. As we die more and more of ourselves, we proclaim by our dying that God is more and more to us. What John the Baptist proclaimed becomes truer in us: “I must decrease, so he may increase!” so that in due time we can honestly proclaim as with St. Paul: “It is Jesus and not I who lives in me.” And so this third Son who is faithful in words and deeds, faithful in fact in everything in his life, will become the very spirit of our own life. We ask especially as we journey along the last leg of our Liturgy’s Ordinary time, that Christ our Lord may continue to reveal himself to us, and allow this kind of fidelity to spring forth and take root in us and our communities. So the we, the 4th child in this parable, may indeed become faithful children in word and in deed. God Bless! Homily delivered by Fr. Victor Baltazar, SJ 26th Sunday in Ordinary Time 1 October 2023  

General, Homilies, Soul Food

Ouch

Matthew 16:21-27 My friend told me this story when she came for a visit last month. There’s this theology professor in her school; famous, published, often quoted, but feared. He’s that type who knows he’s good. But he has ways of reminding you that he is, ā€˜yung ganong klase. And you know how people like that can be, right? Takes little to irk them, they’re catty & sarcastic, they don’t hesitate to show that they have more important things to do than entertain your opinion or answer your stupid question, & all that. One day, one of the professor’s students asked for a deadline extension for his paper. The kid was just recovering from an injury due to an accident. Well, Professor X, true to form, wouldn’t budge. He was catty, sarcastic, & dismissive. After being needlessly lectured, the student finally said, ā€œYou know what, professor, you’re a (jerk).ā€ (He actually used another word that begins with an ā€œA,ā€ but it’s not appropriate in church.) Professor X stopped dead, shocked. First time someone made him aware of what everybody already thought & said of him but were too afraid say so: that he may be an accomplished academic, but he was just a big, self-absorbed, arrogant jerk (not the actual word). After telling me the story, my friend said, ā€œThis reminds me of what my therapist told me one time: a jerk stays a jerk until somebody says ouch.ā€ Ā  Ā  Ā  I’ve read & heard today’s Gospel as many times as you have. But funny that it’s only now I notice it: the word ā€œshow.ā€ ā€œJesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem, suffer greatly from (the religious authorities), be killed, & be raised.ā€ Now I’m wondering: how might Jesus have shown that he must go to Jerusalem w/ full knowledge of the risk of death? Ano, hindi kaya siya mapakali? Lagi kaya siyang balisa? Madalas kaya siyang nakatingin sa malayo na malalim na iniisip? Mabilis kaya siyang mainis? But more importantly, sisters & brothers, what was he thinking of doing in Jerusalem so bad, that that it showed? If he was going back there to preach & heal, well, he did that every day, uneventfully. So, nothing extraordinary would’ve shown in Jesus’ behavior if that was the only thing he planned on doing. But he must’ve felt in his bones: this ā€œtrip to Jerusalemā€ wasn’t going to be the parlor game of musical chairs. It might just be his last journey. Now that would’ve shown, wouldn’t it? So, what was he thinking of doing that he knew would likely seal his fate for good? I can only think of one thing: cleansing the Temple. Jesus was going to finally say ouch. When Jesus marches to Jerusalem, he will carry in his heart all the names & faces of people whom the religious authorities have disregarded, ostracized, separated—all because of their wrong interpretation of God’s Law; their elitist, discriminatory, ritualistic, formalistic, anti-poor, wrong interpretation of God’s Law. What better place to bring the people’s ouch but the Temple? The beating heart of Israel’s faith. The dwelling place of Adonai…which the authorities had long been cashing in on, stealing from, & milking. Kasi ang daming pumapasok na pera at mga alay. But Jesus knows, when he says ouch, no, when he shows his ouch, the holy authorities may just pounce on him this time, until ouch he can say no more. ā€œSay what you want about us, Jesus of Nazareth,ā€ I could almost hear the Pharisees & Sadducees think, ā€œBut don’t you ever touch our money & power.ā€ I’m not on any social media except maybe the classroom & church which I consider social media anyway. So, I ask my younger Jesuit brothers, ā€œMay umaaray na ba sa social media tunkol sa (pagka-inutil) ng mga pinuno natin sa pagtaas ng presyo ng mga bilihin?ā€ ā€œMeron naman, Father. Marami na.ā€ ā€œE d’un sa mga napakong pangako nung eleksyon, at d’un sa Department of Agriculture, the beating heart of the poor’s problems today (or, more like the heart that stopped beating), may nag-che-chest-pain na ba, may umaaray na?ā€ ā€œMeron, Father. Marami na.ā€ I wonder who, like our Lord, is going to finally take one for the team. Who’s going to march to Jerusalem to carry all the poor’s ouches, & take one for the team? Come to think of it, uso pa ba ā€˜yon, ā€˜yung taking one for the team? May mga bayani pa ba? That’s what a hero is, ā€˜di ba? Someone who takes up all the ouches of the poor & the wounded, & takes one for them. Dear sisters & brothers, you & I are no strangers to taking up our cross, aren’t we? We’ve willingly endured many sacrifices for people, institutions, the vocation we love. But, see, when Jesus said, ā€œwhoever wishes to come after me must deny themselves, take up their cross, & follow me,ā€ he said it during & within a very specific context; the context in which he was about to march up to the holy bullies & say ouch to them & take one for the team. That’s the kind of cross that Jesus was talking about during & within that particular context. In other words, ā€œSinong gustong sumama?ā€ That was the unsaid question. ā€œAnyone want to come?ā€ ā€œGod forbid, Lord, no such thing shall ever happen to you.ā€ So, wala. Walang gustong sumama. Walang gustong sumama para umaray. When was the last time you had the courage to say your ouch to someone? What happened to you after that? Sharing tayo? May ouch story din ako & boy, the consequences were awful & long-drawn. But the Lord & my closest friends knew I told only the naked truth. Anyway, sisters & brothers, since time immemorial as you can see, a jerk remains a jerk until somebody says ouch. I continue to pray to God: ā€œPlease, God, send us an oucher & deliver us from more jerks.ā€ Homily delivered

General, Homilies, Soul Food

Transfiguration

In graduate studies, we were a big community of 8 houses. One day, a Mexican Jesuit ran back to our house & said, ā€œThe American scholastics are going from house to house, removing non-metal vessels from the chapels.ā€ We were an international community. From their native cultures, Jesuits brought back chalices, ciboria, patens made of ceramic, clay, stone, wood, all exquisitely crafted & sublimely designed. For some strange reason, the American scholastics went on this zealous purge of non-metal vessels one fine day, leaving only the usual silver & gold. The Roman Missal instructions do say that metal vessels are preferred. But they allow vessels of other materials, so long as they don’t easily corrupt. Either the zealous scholastics read past the rules they didn’t like, or, they didn’t do their homework. I had asked myself, if Jesus were physically there that day, how would he have countenanced this purge & his person & message & ministry? The recent proposal to forbid you, mass goers, from doing the orans (praying) posture in the Ama Namin bewildered me. Biblically & theologically, the Our Father is a prayer of petition from start to finish. In its entirety, it expresses our desperate dependence on God for everything. I love that we Filipinos physicalize this dependence, if only w/ our hands, & if only in one part of the mass. After all, nothing in Scripture, Tradition, & Magisterium forbids us from assuming such harmless, sinless, yet sincere, & very human posture…of begging. So, I had asked myself, if Jesus were physically there that day, how relevant was this proposal to his person & message & ministry? In the Transfiguration, God showed in no uncertain terms that his Son was the fulfillment of the Law & the Prophets represented by Moses & Elijah. See, sisters & brothers, the phrase ā€œthe Law & the Prophets,ā€ that was the catch-all term for Israel’s entire religious tradition based on hundreds of rules pursuant to the 10 Commandments. These rules governed a Jew right from when one got up at sunrise to one’s last wakeful moment after sunset: what to pray, how to wash, whom to avoid, what to not touch, what sacrifices to burn, how often to show up at synagogue, etc., etc. But in the Transfiguration, God showed that the Law & the Prophets were not just rules inked on sacred parchment. The Law & the Prophets was a Person, w/ a beating heart, w/ hands that touched, held, & healed, w/ breath that gave life, w/ a body that blended in esp. with the poor. So, from here forward, whatever law you obeyed, whatever prophecy you were told, all of it must mirror how God’s beloved Son obeyed them. Contrary to popular thinking, Jesus did not violate an iota of the Law & the Prophets. He fulfilled them the way God meant them fulfilled. How? With utmost care, attention, & priority to the human persons & their desperate need for a better life & their longing for God No wonder God promptly said, ā€œThis is my beloved son. Listen to him.ā€ Meaning: ā€œMy son shows you how I want the Law & the Prophets obeyed.ā€ Listen to him daw, sisters & brothers; to his Son. Alam na alam kasi ng Diyos that when we make ourselves the norm of the law, we tend to listen only to ourselves. The next thing we know—we’ve become harsh on others, & yet, lenient on ourselves. We impose the letter of the law on others, & yet, we invoke the spirit of the law as an alibi when we violate it. Worst, when we presume to be the norm of God’s law, we become quite exclusivistic, bigoted, holier-than-thou, & dismissive of the poor, na para bang sinosolo natin ang Diyos. Exactly what became of the Pharisees & the Sadducees. What did they do? They set themselves as the norm for how people must obey the Law. You could almost hear them say, ā€œBecome like us! Transfigure yourselves!ā€ To Jesus’ eyes, though, they really disfigured the image of God into a ritualistic, legalistic, formalistic, moralistic deity. Ever the karpintero, Jesus went about fixing what the hierarchs disfigured. So, he told eye-opening parables about God. He extended God’s touch in all his healings. He connected people to God & with each other by teaching them to call God, ā€œFather.ā€ He forgave sins. So, in a miracle filled with light, God showed Peter, James, & John his face…in the face of his Son. ā€œThis is my beloved Son who pleases me. Listen to him. For he is the norm, the image & likeness of how I want you to understand, to interpret, & to operationalize…ME.ā€ Sisters & brothers, never mind non-metal chalices, or whether the lay should or shouldn’t assume the orans along w/ the priest during Ama Namin, or whether we should receive communion w/ our hands or w/ our mouths. Our Church has more compelling issues that need our study, our discernment, our decision-making, & our constant praying. Artificial Intelligence, gender diversity, Evangelical & Pentecostal church expansion, Mother Earth’s moan & groan…these & so much more…they demand new eyes & ears, new hearts & mindsets from us Catholics. For us to see Jesus’ countenance & hear Jesus’ voice through all of these bewildering realities, we must be Transfigured, anew, afresh, & unafraid.   Homily delivered by Fr. Arnel Aquino, SJ 18th Sunday in Ordinary Time Cenacle Retreat House

General, Homilies, Soul Food

What Matters Most

The parables, finding the treasure in the field and the pearl of great price, have three distinct moments: finding, then selling and then buying. In both parables, something very very precious is found, something so important, so valuable is found. And so much so that sometimes by accident like the guy who finds a treasure in a field but sometimes after a longer searching like a merchant looking for pearls. Finding that these are so valuable, in joy, both go and sell everything they have in order to buy the field and the pearl of great price. Like us religious especially at one point in our lives we discovered that the value of the Lord was the most important and most valuable thing in our lives and so in joy, I think, we went and sold everything — we gave up our families, we gave up family life, we gave up our careers and we ā€œboughtā€ religious life. We committed ourselves to religious life.Ā  The more I think about it, the real challenge is what at one point seemed so important, sometimes we find it less important or see it less important. At least that’s what I’ve seen. I’m reading a very good book by Miraslov Volf. The title of the book is called, ā€œLife Worth Livingā€. It’s based on a course he and others give to undergraduates to help them discover what matters most in life. It’s a course that helps people discover what makes a human life worth living, what makes a life truly human,Ā  what matters most. Because you can succeed professionally and still be a failure as a human being. Early in the book there was an example about Albert Speer, the architect of Hitler who ended up building concentration camps and the gas chambers. He wanted really to be a great architect and in the end he became a great architect but he was a failure as a human being. But at the end of the book, Volf says that for most of us the problem is not that we’re going to live evil lives, that’s still a possibility. It’s a possibility that we choose wrongly; we betray our humanity by living evil lives. But what struck me most was, for most of us, the problem is, the temptation is to live trivial ives. We may have seen what mattered most at one point and then there are forces in our culture that made us forget what matters most and to start living trivially not exactly betray our humanity but to give up on our potential as human beings. And he said that there are two temptations to trivial lives. First is what we see all around us — advertising, the media — everything dresses up unimportant things that they conceal much more important ones. So we might say, ā€œI really want to serve God and my neighbors but when I look at my time and where I spent my money on, I discover that my priority might not be that. I might see that appearance is more important or entertainment is more important, or fame is more important, or titles and positions.ā€ Our culture dresses up all these things that make them seem so important so we can get distracted to run after those things and at the end we find the life we live is hollow. The other temptation to triviality is to think of our lives as trivial. We say, ā€œThe world is so big, how do I count? What I do, what I decide, what does it do to many? Who am I? I can’t do anything.ā€ And so the temptation is to believe that our lives are really not that important. Maybe we’re not a separate greatness, maybe we’re not the most important in this world but we count. The way we live our lives, the decisions we make, the way we treat others, make a difference maybe not for the whole world but for the people we live with, the people who are entrusted to us.Ā  I think the invitation of the Gospel is to not allow ourselves to be tempted to live trivial lives and to try to focus on what matters most — the treasure in the field, the pearl of great price. Whatever that is to us. There are moments when we see so clearly what matters most often during retreats. I just finished my retreat in Baguio last week and I realized so many of the things I am concerned about — my appearance, aging, health, achievements, comparing myself with others, titles, positions — all of those are unimportant. But there was a moment that God made it clear to me that what matters most to me, especially at this stage of my life, is to live as a beloved child of God and to live the example of Jesus. It was so clear to me…then I went down the mountain… šŸ˜‰ Let me just end by reading a section from the book which I found very helpful: ā€œš˜¾š™¤š™¢š™žš™£š™œ š™©š™¤ š™–š™£ š™žš™£š™Øš™žš™œš™š™© š™–š™—š™¤š™Ŗš™© š™¬š™š™–š™© š™¢š™–š™©š™©š™šš™§š™Ø š™¢š™¤š™Øš™© š™žš™Ø š™”š™žš™ š™š š™Ŗš™£š™˜š™¤š™«š™šš™§š™žš™£š™œ š™– š™„š™§š™šš™˜š™žš™¤š™Ŗš™Ø, š™›š™§š™–š™œš™žš™”š™š š™©š™§š™šš™–š™Øš™Ŗš™§š™š š™—š™Ŗš™§š™žš™šš™™ š™žš™£ š™©š™š™š š™™š™šš™Øš™šš™§š™©. š™š™£š™”š™šš™Øš™Ø š™®š™¤š™Ŗ š™¢š™–š™§š™  š™žš™© š™–š™£š™™ š™Øš™š™žš™šš™”š™™ š™žš™© š™›š™§š™¤š™¢ š™©š™š™š š™¬š™žš™£š™™, š™©š™š™š š™Øš™–š™£š™™š™Ø š™¤š™› š™”š™žš™›š™š š™¬š™žš™”š™” š™—š™”š™¤š™¬ š™¤š™«š™šš™§ š™©š™š™š š™©š™¤š™„ š™¤š™› š™žš™© š™–š™£š™™ š™Øš™¬š™–š™”š™”š™¤š™¬ š™žš™© š™—š™–š™˜š™  š™Ŗš™„. š™š™£š™”š™šš™Øš™Ø š™®š™¤š™Ŗ š™šš™­š™˜š™–š™«š™–š™©š™š š™žš™© š™˜š™–š™§š™šš™›š™Ŗš™”š™”š™®, š™žš™© š™¬š™žš™”š™” š™—š™š š™”š™¤š™Øš™© š™›š™¤š™§š™šš™«š™šš™§.Ā  š™Žš™¤ š™Øš™©š™žš™˜š™  š™¬š™žš™©š™ š™žš™©. š˜¾š™–š™§š™«š™š š™¤š™Ŗš™© š™¢š™¤š™¢š™šš™£š™©š™Ø š™¤š™› š™Øš™©š™žš™”š™”š™£š™šš™Øš™Ø š™©š™¤ š™§š™šš™©š™Ŗš™§š™£ š™©š™¤ š™©š™š™š š™Œš™Ŗš™šš™Øš™©š™žš™¤š™£. š™€š™–š™§š™”š™® š™žš™£ š™©š™š™š š™¢š™¤š™§š™£š™žš™£š™œ, š™—š™šš™›š™¤š™§š™š š™©š™š™š š™£š™¤š™žš™Øš™š š™¤š™› š™©š™š™š š™™š™–š™® š™—š™šš™œš™žš™£š™Ø. š™‡š™–š™©š™š š™žš™£ š™©š™š™š š™šš™«š™šš™£š™žš™£š™œ, š™¬š™š™šš™£ š™©š™š™š š™˜š™”š™–š™¢š™¤š™§ š™š™–š™Ø š™—š™šš™œš™Ŗš™£ š™©š™¤ š™™š™žš™š š™™š™¤š™¬š™£. š™š™žš™œš™š™© š™žš™£ š™©š™š™š š™¢š™žš™™š™™š™”š™š š™¤š™› š™©š™š™š š™¬š™¤š™§š™ š™™š™–š™®, š™¬š™š™šš™£ š™®š™¤š™Ŗ š™˜š™–š™£ š™¬š™§š™šš™Øš™© š™– š™›š™šš™¬ š™¢š™žš™£š™Ŗš™©š™šš™Ø š™›š™§š™¤š™¢ š™©š™š™š š™š™–š™£š™™š™Ø š™¤š™› š™”š™žš™›š™šā€™š™Ø š™©š™–š™Øš™ š™Ø š™–š™£š™™ š™™š™šš™¢š™–š™£š™™š™Ø. š™’š™š™šš™£š™šš™«š™šš™§ š™–š™£š™™ š™š™¤š™¬š™šš™«š™šš™§ š™®š™¤š™Ŗ š™˜š™–š™£, š™¢š™–š™ š™š š™Øš™„š™–š™˜š™š š™›š™¤š™§ š™©š™š™š š™Œš™Ŗš™šš™Øš™©š™žš™¤š™£. š˜æš™–š™§š™š š™©š™¤ š™¢š™–š™ š™š š™žš™© š™– š™©š™¤š™„š™žš™˜ š™¤š™› š™˜š™¤š™£š™«š™šš™§š™Øš™–š™©š™žš™¤š™£ š™¬š™žš™©š™ š™©š™š™š š™„š™šš™¤š™„š™”š™š š™®š™¤š™Ŗ š™«š™–š™”š™Ŗš™š š™¢š™¤š™Øš™©.” “š™„š™› š™®š™¤š™Ŗ š™›š™šš™šš™” š™®š™¤š™Ŗā€™š™«š™š š™›š™¤š™Ŗš™£š™™ š™– š™©š™§š™šš™–š™Øš™Ŗš™§š™š, š™§š™šš™©š™Ŗš™§š™£ š™©š™¤ š™žš™© š™–š™œš™–š™žš™£ š™–š™£š™™ š™–š™œš™–š™žš™£ā€”š™©š™¤ š™¬š™š™–š™© š™¢š™–š™©š™©š™šš™§š™Ø š™¢š™¤š™Øš™©. š™€š™­š™˜š™–š™«š™–š™©š™š š™žš™©.

Homilies, Soul Food

Faith Takes Time and Trust

Quick results. This is a way that many ads get our attention and make us want a certain product or service. ā€œLose twenty pounds in two weeks!ā€ā€œGet visibly lighter skin in seven days!ā€ ā€œWhiten your teeth in threedays!ā€ There are even apps that help you ā€œreadā€ a whole book (and get the key ideas) in 15 minutes! We get it, time is limited and we want to make the most of it by imposing control and expecting speedy outcomes. What becomes problematic though is when we adopt that same control-driven, quick-results mindset to our spiritual life. As our Gospel reading today reminds us, there is no shortcut to salvation or sanctity. We are familiar with this parable of the weeds and the wheat. This powerful story conveys profound lessons about patient trust in the Lord, refraining from hasty judgments, and recognizing that holiness is not something we achieve on our own power. Of course, we want to be good, we want to love and obey the Lord, and we want to experience salvation. Too often though, we want to take matters into our own hands. Spirituality then becomes a competitive sport. I have accompanied several people who are well-meaning and earnest, and yet have become so disillusioned with their ā€œlack of progressā€ so much so that they want to give up. We strive so hard to be perfect, and we try to root out our flaws and imperfectionsusing our own wits and efforts. This also translates to how we interact with others. We are quick to judge who are ā€œweedsā€ and who are ā€œwheatā€ and treat them accordingly. However, we presume that we can tell between the weeds and wheat. The thing is, we often cannot and this is what the parable emphasizes. Commentators have pointed out that the weed named in the parable is a particular kind known to resemble wheat in the early stages of growth. Pulling up the weeds is indeed risky because we might not know if we are also pulling up the wheat! And how is this also accurate in our experience? How often are we so quick to judge another person as bad or worthless at face value only to realize that we do not have the full picture? And how many times does this happen in our own interior life? What we consider our strength or gift turns out to be our blind spot, and our weakness turns out to be a source of tremendous grace? We are then invited to trust in the Lord’s wisdom, even when, or especially when our impatience with the world and ourselves lead to frustration and disillusionment. Sometimes we can seem we know better than God, who has ā€œmastery over all thingsā€ as our first reading reminds us. We are also reminded to rely on the Holy Spirit, who ā€œcomes to the aid of our weaknessā€ as Paul exhorts his readers. This is why we also need to be discerning and allow time to unfold to reveal what is true from what is false. A helpful attitude would be what Teilhard de Chardin wrote about:ā€œPatient Trust – Above all, trust in the slow work of God. We are quite naturally impatient in everything to reach the end without delay. We should like to skip the intermediate stages. We are impatient of being on the way to something unknown, something new. And yet it is the law of all progress that it is made by passing through some stages of instability—and that it may take a very long timeā€¦ā€We need to ā€œgive Our Lord the benefit of believing that his hand is leading us, and accept the anxiety of feeling ourself in suspense and incomplete.ā€ Friends, let us pray for this grace of patient trust. And be reminded that with God and in all things that matter, what is important is not the quick superficial result, but the one that leads us to everlasting life. Homily delivered by Fr Jordan Orbe, SJĀ  22 July 2023 (16th Sunday in Ordinary Time) Cenacle Retreat House

General, Homilies, Soul Food

11th Sunday in Ordinary Time

After the great feasts of Easter, Ascension and Pentecost, which with Holy Week highlight the key mysteries of our salvation, we had three complementary feasts to round out our sense of the saving God: Trinity Sunday, Corpus Christi and the Sacred Heart. They express the mystery and wonder of God beyond our comprehension, who is still close to us and bound to us in love. Today’s readings continue that theme: a God who is utterly concerned and seeking what works for our good. The Old Testament passage from Exodus is put in terms of Israel’s covenant with God, a somewhat legal sounding relationship where God tells his Ā people to stay close to him — much as a mother or father would tell a child to hold my hand while we cross the street.” I don’t want harm to come to you.” But even if expressed in legal terms of “listening to my voice and keeping my covenant,” there is God’s reaching out to Israel. They will be “dearer to me that all other people, … a kingdom of priests, a holy nation.” There’s a closeness and valuing. And not simply to leave non-Israelites out. Remember that Israel was ultimately intended to be ‘light of the nations,’ priest-mediators through whom God would reach out to everyone, a vocation that would, by many, be squandered except for Jesus and his Jewish disciples. Romans pushes even more deeply how much God reaches out to us. Beginning with how “the love of God has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit that has been given to us,” there follows today’s reading which spells out how not even our sinfulness and unworthiness can get in the way of God’s desire to give us life. “Greater love no one has,” Jesus tells us, “than to lay down his life for friends . . . and you are my friends.” But Romans fills out the picture: sinful friends, whom nobody would die for except a loving Lord, who saves us by his death and life, his cross and resurrection. So we can now boast of this God who through Christ brings us back to himself. The gospel too points in the same direction. Jesus goes about curing every disease and illness, Matthew says, and then today’s reading: “because his heart was moved with pity for them, because they were troubled and abandoned like sheep without a shepherd.” Then he reminds us what ministry in the Church is meant to be: not privilege or power, but labor to let all share God’s harvest. Ordinary people like Peter, James, John, etc., are called to embody God’s concern and care for people starting with Israel (since God remains faithful to his promises to them), but ultimately to “all nations.” Certainly, a theme that Pope Francis has urged over and over- inclusiveness, leaving nobody out of the picture. So let us give thanks that this is the way God is constantly inviting us to share grace upon grace, concerned about us, not casting us off when we go astray but reaching out more lovingly to bring us home. And as we “boast” in this Lord, we want to be reminded of our vocations to be extensions of God’s love and kindness wherever we find ourselves. “Without cost you have received,” Jesus tells his apostles; “without cost you are to give.” Let us continue to be very much aware of what we have received, and ever more ready to be givers and sharers of that same love and concern that the Lord extends to us.   Homily delivered by Fr. William (Bill) Abbott, SJ 17 June 2023 Anticipated Sunday Mass Cenacle Retreat House

General, Homilies, Soul Food

Pentecost

There is a line in the acts of the apostles in Pentecost about the devout Jews. ā€œNow there were devout Jews from every nation under heaven staying in Jerusalem.ā€ – Acts 2:5 The Greek word for ā€œdevoutā€ (eulabįø—s) refers to a person who clings to the good once it is known, and as it is known. It suggests a certain being circumspect or cautious of what is in the world because not everything is good. But once the good is known, that person will take hold of that good carefully and surely. That is what devout means: a person who is a searcher of the good and who clings to the good, redefines one’s life totally according to the call and demand of the good. In yesterday’s homily on the Feast of the Cenacle, Fr Roger Champoux spoke about entering the realm of the sacred, of sanctification, and of consecration; of allowing oneself to be possessed by and oriented towards the loving and tender embrace of the Good, and the good God. Here, we find an echo on this in the Jews gathered in Jerusalem who are described as ā€œdevout.ā€ They are those who are already predisposed towards the good, and have oriented their entire lives towards the good God. Devotedness is this inner predisposition by which the Spirit can more fully enter into us further bless us. In the narrative of Pentecost in Acts 2, there is ambiguity and ambivalence in that not everyone heard the message of the apostles in their own language. Others heard only drunken speech. Why this then disparity and difference in Pentecost? I believe that it was only to the devout Jews coming from all parts of the lived world of that time that the gift of interpretation was also given by the Spirit. Their being devout open up the way for them to also receive the Spirit’s gift of interpretation by which the devout Jews were enabled to accurately and intelligibly hear and understand in their own native tongue what was otherwise heard as drunken speech by the non-devout crowd in Jerusalem. In the New Testament, the Greek word for ā€œinterpretā€ (diermĆ©neuó) means to explain things thoroughly, completely or fully, and accurately: it is the same word used to describe what the risen Jesus did in explaining the Scriptures to the disciples on the road to Emmaus. It is this gift of interpretation, this further gift of the Spirit to the already devout Jews of that time, that also helps us today to discern truth amid the ambivalence, ambiguity and confusion of a noisy world. The gift of interpretation renders clear and intelligible the matter of discernment to devout persons who sincerely seek and fundamentally orient their lives towards goodness in whatever form it is discovered and encountered in the world. With the Spirit’s gift of interpretation, confusion is transformed into clarity. Devout that we are, let us more proactively await and pray for this grace of interpreting the signs of the times and the movement of the Spirit that may be initially heard as the noise of the world. Let us pray for this gift of interpretation so that we can understand more clearly what the Spirit is saying to us and to churches. May the Spirit further guide us, unfold for us, and translate for us God’s unique message for us and for the world today. Finally, the Gospel today says that ā€œJesus breathed on themā€ (John 20:22). The Greek word for the breathing action used here (emphysĆ”Å) occurs only once throughout the New Testament, and it is the same word also used in the Greek Old Testament in the creation story when God breathed life into the human being. This word correlates to another Greek word for breath (pneuma): ā€œReceive the Holy Spiritā€ (pneuma). ā€œSpiritā€ means ā€œbreathā€. Our invitation today is simply to stand before the Lord our Creator and allow ourselves to receive the breath of Christ which is the Spirit. This relates to what Fr Roger in yesterday’s homily said about the foundress’ (ThĆ©rĆØse Couderc’s) spirituality of ā€œse livrerā€: that is, to deliver or entrust oneself totally to the Lord, to allow one’s life to be totally defined, shaped and oriented anew by the breath of Christ, that is the Holy Spirit, the Holy Breath. In a way, it is difficult because it involves a radical dying to self when we define our lives according to our own terms, or in conformity to the standards of the world. Pentecost calls us to simply let go and simply stand before the Lord and open ourselves widely to the coming of Spirit. To simply stand and be open: that is why the foundress also says that ā€œse livre” is the easiest thing to do. To simply stand and be open to God’s work in us, to be most docile and malleable to the freedom of the Spirit in shaping our lives and directions in life, to allow ourselves to be completely redefined and reshaped by the Spirit: Ikaw bahala, Lord. Se livre. And so in this mass on the Solemnity of Pentecost, let us pray for the three graces of the Spirit: the gift of devotedness; the gift of interpretation; and the gift of ā€œse livrerā€ Homily delivered by Fr. Oliver Dy, SJ 28 May 2023 | Solemnity of Pentecost Cenacle Retreat House    

General, Homilies, Soul Food

Feast of the Cenacle

Why is TODAY the Feast of the Cenacle? It looks like a rather non-significant day when nothing happens in the world and in the Church. And the date even changes each year! The Resurrection is finished, Jesus has gone up to heaven, and the Holy Spirit has not yet come. There is, however, the ā€œupper room,ā€ also called ā€œCenacle.ā€ It looks like a very important part of the ā€œcharismā€ of the Cenacle. If we take a look at the readings for today’s feast, we hear first Ezekiel, who makes a marvelous promise in the name of God: ā€œI will give you a new heart, I will put a new spirit into you, I will be your God.ā€ But a promise remains a promise: it gives hope, which is good, but it is only really good when the promise does happen. And suddenly, with the 2nd reading, we find ourselves in the Acts of the Apostles, and this time, the promise comes from Jesus himself: ā€œYou shall receive power when the Holy Spirit shall come upon you: and you shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem (…) and to the ends of the earth.ā€ Another promise, but it sounds more urgent, so ā€œthey returned to Jerusalem and they went to the upper room, where they were staying.ā€ And there, they did nothing but ā€œwith one accord, devoted themselves to prayer, together with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus and his brothers.ā€ (Remember, the ā€œupper roomā€ is the Cenacle). With the recent liturgical changes in most parts of the Church, Pentecost is tomorrow, so the promise will soon come true and the mission will begin, with Mary in the very middle of it. From the Cenacle to the Mission. What does the Gospel add to this waiting in hope? What does Jesus say in his final prayer to the Father with his friends? Just before today’s Gospel, Jesus tells his Father something like, ā€œI’ve done my job: they know now that all you have given me comes from you, and that the words I gave to them are the very words that You gave me.ā€ He is the Word, and they know it. Then a few lines later, in today’s gospel, we hear: ā€œMay they be one as we are one. Now I am coming to you, and I am saying these things in the world that they may have the fullness of my joy in themselves. Sanctify them in truth; your word is truth. As you sent me into the world, so I send them into the world. And I give my life for them so that they may also be sanctified by the truth.ā€ Before the sending for mission, we have the ā€œsanctify them in truth, in your word.ā€ (Two days ago, in Harvard, without quoting Jesus, Tom Hanks proclaimed loudly: ā€œTruth is sacred.ā€) We have here two possible translations of one Greek world: ā€œhagiazo,ā€ to sanctify or to consecrate, and the meaning of that Greek word is something like, to enter gradually and totally into the life of God. From this Gospel, the meaning we have is that the mission is not first but second, it comes from this inner gift promised by Ezechiel of God’s Spirit being with us, and inviting us to be with Him. This is why they are in the Cenacle, one in prayer before they will be sent for the Mission, waiting for the Gift of the Spirit so that the Mission will truly be God’s Mission. And here, I think we meet Mother Therese on something that was very important for her, but that is very hard to translate into English. The Cenacle Constitutions rightly say: this feast today ā€œcelebrates the mystery of prayerful expectation and waiting in retreat with Mary by the first assembly of the Church, directed to that outpouring of the Spirit which sent the apostles to the ends of the earth.ā€ And they add: Ā« We give witness to a good God, after our foundress who said that ā€œGod is good, even more than good, He is Goodness: Dieu est la BontĆ© mĆŖme.ā€ Your Holy Foundress also said: Ā« The great means to enter the way of holiness is ā€˜se livrer’ to our good God,ā€ adding: ā€œMake the experience of it and you will see that it is the true happiness that we would seek in vain without it.ā€ Is this not the Gospel of today, sanctification in truth? The only problem is the question that Saint ThĆ©rĆØse poses herself: ā€œWhat does this mean, ā€œse livrerā€?ā€ She admits, however, that ā€œI understand the spaciousness of this word but I cannot explain it. It embraces present and future, it is more than to devote oneself or to give oneself, even more than to abandon oneself to God.ā€ Wow, what does she really mean by this famous untranslatable French word? She tries her best to explain it: ā€œIt is to die to everything and to oneself, no longer to busy oneself with the self, except to hold the self always turned toward God. It is not to seek oneself in anything, neither for the temporal nor for the spiritual. No longer to seek our personal holiness, but only the good pleasure of God.ā€ And she adds: ā€œIt is a spirit of detachment that does not hold on to anything, neither to people, to things, to time, to places. It is to accept all, to subject oneself to all.ā€ Only the good pleasure of God… She explains further that it might look very difficult, but she insists: ā€œThere is nothing as easy to do as this. It only consists in making once only a generous act, saying in all sincerity: My God, I want to belong to you, accept my offering, and all is said. However, we need to remember that we have ā€œgiven ourself.ā€ And Mother ThĆ©rĆØse concludes: ā€œIf we could understand beforehand the sweetness and the peace that we feel when we do not put any restriction with

Scroll to Top