Homily

General, Homilies, Homily, Soul Food

The Solemnity of the Lord’s Epiphany

One cold winter morning, three palm fruit farmers were warming themselves by the fireside. Soon two of them were engaged in a heated debate comparing their religions to decide which one was the true religion. Okoro, the oldest among them, sat quietly listening to the debate. Suddenly the two turned to him and asked, ā€œDecide for us, Okoro. Which religion is the right one?ā€ Okoro rubbed his white beard and said thoughtfully, ā€œWell, you know there are three ways to get to the oil mill from where we are. You can go right over the hill. That is shorter but it is a steep climb. You can go around the hill on the right side. That is not too far, but the road is rough and full of potholes. Or you can go around the hill on the left side. That is the longest way, but it is also the easiest.ā€ He paused and then added, ā€œBut you know, when you get there, the mill man doesn’t ask you how you came. All he asks is, ā€˜Man, how good is your fruit?ā€™ā€ In the stories of Jesus’ birth, two special groups of people came to visit the new-born babe: the shepherds and the magi. The church has no special feast to commemorate the visit of the shepherds, but we have this special feast of Epiphany today to celebrate the visit of the magi. Why is that? It is because the visit of the magi is an eye-opener. The shepherds learnt of the birth of Jesus through a direct revelation from angels appearing in the midnight sky. This is direct and supernatural revelation. Many of us have no problem with that. The magi, on the other hand, learnt of the birth of Jesus by observing a star. The star did not say anything to them. They had to interpret this natural sign of the star to know what it meant and where it led. If we remember that the magi or the three wise men were nature worshippers, people who divined God’s will by reading the movements of the stars and other heavenly bodies, then we can see how the visit of the magi challenges some of our popular beliefs. Like the palm fruit farmers, religious people of all persuasions tend to think that their religious tradition is the only way to God. We hastily conclude that the way of God equals the way of our religious tradition. Yet the word of God cautions us against such a narrow interpretation. ā€œFor my thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways my ways, says the Lordā€ (Isaiah 55:8). That is why we are fascinated with the story of the visit of the magi. It is a unique story that opens our eyes to the fact that God is not limited to any one religious tradition. God is open for everyone. Second, notice how people of different religious traditions came to know that the Son of God was born. The shepherds [who were regarded as unclean and could not take part in Temple worship without undergoing purification] came to know through a direct vision of the angels. The magi knew through a reading of the stars. And King Herod’s scribes came to know through searching the scriptures. Visions, stars, scriptures — different ways of arriving at the same truth. Of course, this does not mean that any religious tradition is just as good as the other. Notice how Matthew indicates that when the guiding star got to Jerusalem its light failed, and the magi had to consult the scriptures to direct them to Bethlehem. Over and above the natural light of the star the magi still needed the supernatural light of scripture to finally get to Jesus. Yet the crucial question in the story remains: Who actually got to find Jesus? Herod and his scribes who had the scriptures failed to find Jesus but the magi who followed the natural light of the stars were able to find him. Why? Because the Jewish authorities, even though they possessed the shining truth of revealed scriptures, did not follow it. They did not walk in the light of the scriptures. The magi, on the other hand, who enjoyed only a star light followed its guidance. This fact reminds us that it is not the possession of the truth that matters, it is how prepared we are to walk in the light of the truth that we possess. It is how we make use of the faith that was given us that matters most. It seems better to have the dim light of the stars and follow it than to have the bright light of the Holy Scriptures and neglect it. As Christians we believe that our religion possesses the fullness of truth. But what does that benefit us if we do not walk in the truth? Nature worshippers or non-believers who are sincerely committed to following the dim light of natural reason may also arrive at Jesus before Christians who have the exalted truths revealed by God but who do not walk the walk of faith. This is the challenging truth we celebrate today in the story of these pagan wise men who seek and find the Lord. What leads us to truth is not who we are but what our intentions are. The stars in our life lead us, we make choices on whether to follow them. Thus, it is worth asking ourselves: what are the stars in my life? How and to what is God calling me at this time in my life? Where does he want me to find him, to serve and follow him? This very day, let us stop in our tracks. Obviously, at this stage there are many things which, for better or worse, we cannot change, some decisions, right or wrong, which we cannot now undone. But it is not too late to look for our star and begin following it from where we are now.

General, Homilies, Soul Food

New Year’s Eve Homily

Introduction Isn’t it a bit strange that the Church celebrates the motherhood of Mary on the first day of the year? Have you ever asked that question to yourself? Why, after celebrating advent waiting for the Christ, and Christmas, welcoming the birth of the Lord, the liturgy now goes back to Mary? Isn’t reflecting about Jesus or the Holy Spirit or even God the father, a more appropriate celebration for today, the first day of the year? The New Year in the context of Christmas We may fail to appreciate the real importance and meaning of today’s feast if we don’t look back to what had happened for the past days. Today is the octave of Christmas. [Side notes: There are two very important feasts in the church calendar that are celebrated with octave: Easter and Christmas. These mysteries are of great importance that they are celebrated for eight consecutive days.] What did we celebrate in Christmas? We celebrated Christ’s birth. One Christmas day a couple of thousand years ago, the son of God was born by a woman named Mary who betrothed to a man named Joseph. Their son was named Jesus, was foretold by an angel, who will be Emmanuel, God is with us. And who among us here do not know the story? All of us; we know the details—virgin birth, birth in a manger in swaddling cloths, angels singing, shepherds and kings or magi visiting to pay homage. We as Christians have been telling this story, passing it on from generation to generation. Some things were added to further enhance the celebrations. Santa Clause, gifts and shopping, and food, and many more; sad to admit that sometimes, we focus more on the trimmings rather than on what really is the essence of the story. But what is really the essence of the story? One important fact—that God, in his desire to communicate to us and express his love, spoke through the birth of his son. He had to speak through a son because we can neither see with our eyes nor hear with our ears God. God has to become flesh—incarne—literally to become flesh, so that we may perceive what God wants to say. And the word became flesh so that we may understand. But that happened 2000 years ago. Mary gave birth to the human Jesus on the first Christmas. Last December 25 must be the 2024th Christmas, right? More or less. Today, several thousand years since, God still wishes to communicate to us. Do we need another Mary to give birth to another Jesus? Maybe not the same characters once more, but same story. Jesus still needs to be born. We still need to communicate Jesus to a deaf world, struggling to see and find God. We need to communicate God to everyone more than ever. And it is here where today’s feast becomes significant. I think, more than honoring Mary herself on the first day of the year, we are honoring her motherhood, her theotokos— the mother of God. We honor the birthing, we need to give birth to Jesus. Like Mary, we have to bear and give birth to Jesus wherever we are. Her motherhood is equally a grace and challenge for each one of us. This is the grace we received when we were baptized. In and through our own humanity, we en-flesh—in-carne—the Lord. In a sense, becoming mothers of our Lord and giving birth to him in our midst is a grace we received. This is our grace—we can do it. In our joys and sorrows, we bring that grace to reality. But it is also equally a challenge—it’s not easy to give birth to Jesus, to be a bearer of the Lord. How many times can others really see Jesus in us? How many times are people blessed because of us? We know that it is a challenge and often time we retreat run away when called. And it is particularly significant that if you look back at our celebrations for the past days, the past liturgies tells us the difficulty. On the 25 was Christmas day. The next day, the 26th was the feast of St. Stephen, the first Christian martyr stoned to death. On the 27th was the feast of St. John the evangelist–the writer of the fourth gospel, on the 28th was the celebration of the holy innocents, on the 29th St Thomas Becket–the bishop of Canterbury who was martyred when he stood up against the king and royalty. The eight days of celebration after Christmas was marked my martyrdom. Challenges. One night, I was talking to a Jesuit friend. We entered the seminary together. He said, ā€œNo good deeds are left unpunished.ā€ This is the harsh reality of life. This is what motherhood of Mary means; it is by no way reserved only to Mary, we are graced and challenged to be mothers of Jesus too. Mary was the mother of the human Jesus 2000 years ago; you and I are graced and challenged to give birth to the resurrected Christ today, in our midst–in truly loving one another, in forgiveness, in our generosity, in little deeds of charity. Let me end with the lyrics of a song written anonymously entitled The Work of Christmas. Let this remind us of theotokos, the motherhood of God. The Work of Christmas When the song of angels is stilled, when the star in the sky is gone when the kings and princes are home when the shepherds are back with their flock the work of Christmas begins. To find the lost, to heal the broken to feed the hungry free the prisoners to rebuild nations to bring peace among brothers (and sisters) to make music in the heart. May all of us accept the grace and challenge to give birth to the Emmanuel, the resurrected Christ today, in our midst. Amen. Homily delivered by Fr. James Gascon, SJ on New Year’s Eve Mass, The Solemnity of the

General, Homilies, Soul Food

What’s in a Name?

MEMORIAL OF THE MOST HOLY NAME OF JESUS: WHAT’S IN A NAME? Remember the names that parents gave their newborn babies during the pandemic? In the US, the most famous ones would be Covid for boys and Corona for girls. In India, one infant was reportedly named Sanitiser, another Virus or veerus for some babies in the Philippines. The intention of course was very clear: it was to remember the difficult but nonetheless blest time that the baby was born. But how we wished that these parents were more creative like couples in the US who named their baby Demi which is short for PanDemic, or Rhona short for Corona. And yet nothing would beat babies then named Moderna or Johnson or sinovax or novovax. Surely, the Jews of Jesus’ time and even perhaps now, would have been scandalized by these names. You see, Jews had such respect for names. Names or naming people was such a serious business or a sacred undertaking for them. We say now that the eyes are the windows to the soul of a person. For the Jews, it is their names. Their names are the doors to one’s identity and personality. They contain the very purpose or mission of your life, the very reason for your existence, your place or foothold in the world. During Advent and Christmas, we saw this, not in Matthew’s Genealogy where we were introduced to Jesus’ ancestors with tongue-twister names, but in the advent figures we met who possessed beautiful names – Mary or Miriam which means beloved or rebel, Joseph which means God adds or increases, John which means Gift of God, Elizabeth which is God is abundance, and Zechariah (my favorite) which means God remembers. The Son of God on the other hand, had two names. Immanuel, according to the Prophets of the Old Testament. But Mary and Joseph gave him the name Jesus. Immanuel means God is with us; Jesus, English for Yeshua, on the other hand, means God saves or The Lord is Salvation. There is a debate among bible scholars over why Joseph and Mary chose Jesus and not Immanuel during the brit milah or Jesus’ circumcision (As accounted for in our Gospel today). But more interesting for me, and the point I really want to make is that the Prophets suggested other titles or names for the son of man: Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace, The Lord Our Righteousness, The Son of the Most High, the Son of God, and of course the Messiah, the Savior, the Christ or the Anointed One—which are superlative, majestic titles befitting the dignity of the Supreme Being that is God. But Mary and Joseph did not choose any of these hi falluting, grandiose, or over-the-top names that clearly separated God from all of his creation. They chose Jesus which among Jews is really a common or commoner’s name, like our Juan or Nene. Because that was to be the mission of Jesus: To embrace our common lot. To become one of us or one with us. Which is of course what Immanuel means. But why this mission, why the incarnation, why precisely, Jesus or Immanuel? I think because many of us despise our humanity, our limitations, our vulnerabilities, our weaknesses. Including this imperfect world that we have created. From the very beginning we wanted to escape from our skin and become like God, as Adam and Eve were tempted to do and as the story of the tower of Babel reveals. Now, we are racing to go to Mars or somewhere else, leave earth behind and all its corruption. How ironic, how sad, how unfortunate, because at Christmastime, we are reminded that all that God ever wanted was the opposite of all that. All he wanted was to become one of us and be with us, Jesus, Immanuel. All he wanted was to embrace humanity, warts and all, as we say. And by doing that, he blessed it with his sacred presence. As Cardinal Chito Tagle says, God descends to us, so we can ascend to him. So, friends, as we celebrate this feast, we pray that just as God humbled himself to become the commoner Jesus, may we also become Immanuel, God’s presence, God’s touch, to the people in our lives, and to the world around us. Homily delivered by Fr. Emmanuel (Nono) Alfonso, SJĀ  3 January 2025 Cenacle Retreat House

General, Homilies, Homily, Soul Food

Smitten

To grasp the very gift and meaning of Christmas, I often turn to this story that is really a parable by Soren Kierkegaard. Once upon a time there lived in a great castle a king so powerful and wealthy he was adored and feared by all in his kingdom. Alas, in this kingdom, there lived a beautiful woman, a lowly maiden, with whom he was smitten. Knowing the wide gap between them, the king thought hard about what he would do to win the heart of this woman. At first, he thought of going to her as he was, as king. However, he knew that if he went to her in all his kingly power and glory, with ā€œall the king’s horses and all the king’s men,ā€ she would instantly be his for the taking. She would be dazzled by his wealth and power, or she would be intimidated by the horses and men. She would say ā€œyesā€ out of enchantment or she would not dare say ā€œnoā€ out of fear. The king knew this and pondered deeply how love would ever work if love were not free or if love were driven by fear. Love that was merely enchanted was not love, and love that was afraid was also not love. And so he thought of another way. He would disguise himself as a beggar. Coming to her as a poor man, with all his kingliness hidden from her, he might be more sure of her love (if she ever came to love him back). If he pretended to be poor like her, he would know better if her love was true. Then again, he thought, if he did just that, he wouldn’t be true to her and to himself. What kind of love would thrive in deception, what love would that be if it were based on a lie? As the king agonized over what he would do, he eventually came upon the one and only way he was ever going to win her heart. And that was for him to remove every manner of pretense and divest himself of all his kingly wealth and power. The only way was to leave the comfort of his castle so he could live and share the life of his beloved. To love her and to live with her happily ever after, he decided to disarm and let go of power. Dear friends, the Christmas story is a love story. But it is more than just a fairytale ala Cinderella or some familiar telenovela. Tonight when we draw close to the Child in a manger, we glimpse our king and our God. We come to realize the radical and irreversible choice God has made to love us. May it awaken our faith to see Emmanuel, God with us, becoming vulnerable as we are, taking on our flesh, our joys and tears, our dreams and pain, even our dying. May it calm our fears to hold this Child’s hand in our hand while we walk the darkness of our world. May it warm our love to feel the heart of God beating in ours. And may it quicken our hope to catch the breath of this infant in a manger, breathing new life into us once more. Out of love, a king chooses to disarm and let go of power. As God has so loved us, so are we to love one another. Homily delivered by Fr. Jose Ramon (Jett) T. Villarin SJ during the Christmas Eve Mass at The Cenacle 24 December 2024

General, Homilies, Homily, Soul Food

Mighty

I remember applying to the Society of Jesus about 27 years ago and in one of the interviews, I was asked, so why are you applying? And clumsily, I sputtered out some platitudes but one statement annoyed the Jesuit priest interviewing me. I said something like, I am a sinful person, wounded, fallen, and only God is calling me to the Society to take care of me, to heal me. “What? You think the Society is a hospital, a psychiatric ward?” And I froze. But I’m sure that interviewer would be freezing now what with Pope Francis calling the Church a field hospital. Or maybe, he would have read by now Henry Nouwen writing about all of us being wounded healers. But I remember that interview because in the readings today, we are confronted by this giant of a man that is Elijah, the greatest prophet of Israel. Even John the Baptist in the new testament was just a reiteration of the fearless man of God. As characterized by the Bible, Elijah and John seem to be the standards of the faith against whom we ought to measure up. Certainly they were courageous in proclaiming the word of God; they spoke to power as we say now, Elijah against King Ahab, his powerful queen Jezebel, and the prophets of Baal; John the Baptist against Herod and the Roman empire. Listen to the words with which the Prophet Sirach from the first reading described Elijah: he was like a fire, his words were a flaming furnace, he was awesome in his wondrous deeds and his glory has no equal. Wow! Such high standard indeed. And it is Elijah and his ā€œreincarnationā€ as it were, John the Baptist, who meet us during the early days of Advent and challenge us to prepare for the coming of the Lord. They can appear to be like fierce lions guarding the opening of the cave where Jesus would be born, snarling at you: ā€œAre you really worthy to see the Lord?ā€ Indeed, these advent figures can be daunting to us. Until we remember that Elijah fled from Queen Jezebel for fear of his life for days on end. And out of exhaustion and fear, he went into depression and even asked God to take his life already. Oh, so, the almighty prophet had feet of clay as well! He had moments of weakness and vulnerability like us. John the Baptist was human too. Languishing in jail, at Herod’s order, John heard of Jesus and began nursing doubts and apprehensions whether Jesus was the messiah or whether he was doing it correctly because rather than hurling fire and brimstones at the Jews, Jesus was wining and dining with them. These accounts of course do not subtract anything from the greatness of these prophets of God. But these make them very human like us. They too needed to be saved. They too did not just proclaim the Word but also needed to hear it and receive it as well. So when we encounter them again one of these days of Advent, before we get scared off by them and their over the top personalities, I hope we remember that they are guides, or co-pilgrims or co-seekers on our way to the crib. They too are wounded and broken and in need of the salvation that comes at Christmas. AMEN. Homily delivered by Fr. Emmanuel “Nono” Alfonso, SJ 14 December 2024 Saturday, Second Week of Advent Cenacle Retreat House

Features, General, Homilies, Soul Food

33rd Sunday in Ordinary Time | 2024

There’s this story about a young lector, a beginner, who was reading in church to a big crowd for the first time. He was super nervous and had a difficult time getting through the first reading. When he finished, he accidentally shouted,Ā  “This is the end of the world!” (Of course he meant, “end of the word.” Then the whole congregation replied, “Thanks be to God!” Someone once jokingly said that it is often those who are not certain, not clear about this life we live in now, who worry about the next. At first glance, today’s readings might seem focused on the afterlife, but the readings actually emphasize living fully in the present moment. You may have heard the story of St. John Berchmans, a young Jesuit scholastic who passed away at the age of 22. When asked what he would do if he knew God would call him while he was playing football, he reportedly said, “I would keep playing.” I believe this reflects the idea captured by the Latin phrase ” Age quod agis,” meaning “Do what you are doing.” It encourages all of us, as followers of Christ, to be fully present and dedicated in whatever we are doing, even at the end of our lives. As we approach the Feast of Christ the Eternal King, the Church encourages us to reflect on our readiness to welcome Him, not in the distant future, but here and now, as He is constantly present. The key message of today’s readings is to “watch.” Jesus reminds us that no one knows the exact time of His coming, chacitine the temporary nature of our world. Many people often forget that our time here is limited; and so they live as if, they will be here forever, perhaps accumulating possessions or harboring grudges. Yet, deep down, we all know that we are not permanent; our existence is fleeting and transitory. Given the limited time we have, it is important to focus on living fully in the present, and aligning our actions, with God’s desires. Each of us has a unique role that only we can fulfill, and if we do not take action now, that part of our purpose will remain incomplete. The best time to embrace our calling is in this very moment. This present moment is the foundation for asking meaningful questions during spiritual direction and retreat: What moves you or stirs your heart? What brings you life? What do you truly want to dedicate yourself to? What do you desire most deeply? And what sustains you in times of suffering? To help us focus on the present moment is why we ask those questions. The coming of the Son of Man is a call to unity, not division. By embracing God’s purpose and living fully in the present, we can rise above the fear of missing out, a struggle many young people face today. Our actions should flow from a genuine love for goodness, not from fear or the hope of personal gain. When we adopt this perspective, we discover true contentment and peace, freeing ourselves from the grip of fear and opening our hearts to a life of purpose and fulfillment. The second reading highlights this selfless action and fearlessness, exemplified by Jesus on the Cross. He sacrificed himself for humanity, not for personal gain but to save us from self-absorption, from selfishness and show us the way to new life. Jesus’ life and death are models of unconditional love, inspiring us, moving us to follow His example.Ā  Today, we are invited to shift our focus from a distant future to the profound reality of Christ’s presence with us in this very moment. Let us open our hearts fully to this sacred time, anchoring ourselves in His love, and letting our lives become a reflection of His grace and compassion here and now. Amen.   Homily delivered by Fr. Chris Dumadag, SJ 33rd Sunday in Ordinary Time 16 November 2024 | Anticipated Sunday Mass Cenacle Retreat House

General, Homilies, Soul Food

Meritocracy | Mark 12: 28-34

Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  What did scribes do? They were ancient Israel’s human word processors & Xerox machines. With almost maniacal accuracy, they hand-copied biblical texts word for word on parchment. But before getting to work, they washed their whole body clean. Then, with ink from a special recipe, they wrote each letter carefully, not missing a single dot or dash that Hebrew letters came with, making sure no two letters touched each other. Otherwise, ulit. They said each word out loud as they wrote it. Except the word ā€œYahweh,ā€ w/c was too sacred to verbalize. Instead, they said ā€œAdonai.ā€ But when they came to that name, they stopped, washed their hands 7 times, wiped the pen clean, dipped it anew into the ink, & only then wrote ā€œYahweh.ā€ How many times did the word Yahweh occur in the Torah? Well, that was how many times they washed hands & pen. So, you can imagine how scribes obsessed over the minutiae of the Law! Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  But this one? He was different. Unlike other scribes, Pharisees, teachers of the Law, this one got it. Loving God & neighbor, he said, was ā€œworth more than all burnt offerings & sacrifices.ā€ Jesus had never heard a hierarch soft-pedal Temple sacrifice like that. You see, sisters & brothers, for Jews, sinning was incurring a debt w/ God. Utang. After a long process of purification, sacrificing a dead animal at Temple was the climax of atonement. Whereupon the debt of sin was paid in full. But then & only then did God clear the slate. Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Why do we think that this is absurd today, sisters & brothers? Because it smacks of what we call meritocracy. When we think that what we do or not do for God conditions God to do & not do for us, then, we just might’ve fallen into meritocracy. Meritocracy comes in many subtle religious behaviors today. ā€œI will help the poor so that God will not make me poor. I will help raise funds for the church so that God will accept me into heaven. I will pray the rosary so that Jesus will see I’m devoted to his Mother, & grant my petition & save me.ā€ Seems nothing wrong there, is there?Ā  But scrutinize it a little more & we notice that we’re in fact saying, ā€œIt’s what I do first that will condition God to then do for me what I want him to do.ā€ In meritocracy, God simply reacts to the stimulus of my merits or demerits. But by default, God idles in neutral. My merits rev up his goodness, & my demerits make him hit the brakes on loving me. But sisters & brothers, nothing conditions God. No one conditions God. Not even the holiest of saints condition God. God’s love & his forgiveness are not conditioned by our initiatives at doing good or saying we’re sorry. Baliktad. Because God is loving & forgiving, we, his creatures, are able to love & repent at all. Because we have been loved & forgiven, so do we also love & say we’re sorry. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  The analogy of good parents often helps. Imagine how good parents would feel if their child said, ā€œMom, dad, I will love you so that you will love me. I will be a good child so that you will be good to me.ā€ Absurd. ā€œAnak, nauna na kitang minahal. Patuloy kitang aarugain hanggang matuto ka ring magmahal. Patuloy kitang patatawarin hanggang matuto kang humingi ng tawad at magpatawad. Kung ayaw mong magmahal o humingi ng tawad, ikaw lang ang sisira sa sarili mo. But as far as I’m concerned, hindi kita matitiis. Patuloy kitang mamahalin at patatawarin, kasi anak kita.ā€ That is precisely what a good parent would say. A good parent’s love & pardon are not conditioned by the merits & demerits of their children. Rather, they would like their kids to learn how to love because dad & mom love them, & not so that dad & mom would love them. Good parents would like their kids to say they’re sorry not because mom & dad won’t forgive them if they don’t, but because dad & mom have always forgiven them their faults. True love is not meritocratic. (And yes, sisters & brothers, I am aware that there are parents who are meritocratic. Their love & attention are conditioned by the merits & demerits of their kids. I’ve taught in 3 Ateneo high schools. Children w/ parents like this are often highly accomplished, yes. But they are some of the saddest, most troubled students I’ve ever known. Why? Because in true loving, there should never be meritocracy.) Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Multiply that by a gazillion times w/God whose love goes beyond meritocracy. If God’s love were conditioned by our capacity to pay for the debt of our sins, would we have survived this well for this long? Yet, haven’t we noticed, sisters & brothers? God does not give us what we really deserve. God gives us more than we deserve. ā€œSo, Fr Arnel, going back to sacrifice, good deeds, & atonement, do we not do them anymore since God loves & forgives us anyway?ā€ No, we continue offering sacrifices, loving, & atoning. But never think of them as bribes to God! Because that’s what meritocracy comes down to: bribing God w/ the currency of our merits. But if good parents do not keep a ledger of their children’s merits & demerits according to which they give or deprive them of love & forgiveness, why would our God be any less? No, we continue to sacrifice, to love God & others, to say we’re sorry, because God has loved & forgiven us first & always, & much, much more than we even deserve to be loved & forgiven. Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Sadly, meritocracy is written almost indelibly on the parchment of our Catholic mentality. The Word was made Flesh & dwelt among Jews

General, Homilies, Soul Food

World Mission Sunday 2024

The readings for the 29th Sunday in Ordinary Time bring us face to face with a powerful message about humility, service, and what true greatness is. In the Gospel of Mark that we just proclaimed, James and John ask Jesus for positions of glory in His kingdom. Their request reveals a misunderstanding of what it means to follow Christ. Jesus responds by teaching them—and us—that true greatness is found not in power or prestige but in humble service. “Whoever wishes to be great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be the slave of all. ” Jesus Himself provides the ultimate example: “For the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many.” In the world we live in, greatness is often associated with status, power, and authority. Yet, Jesus flips this understanding on its head. He shows us that greatness in the kingdom of God is not about how much control we can exercise or how high we can climb, but about how low we can stoop and bend in order to serve others. It is a radical call to humility, love, and self-sacrifice.Ā  Jesus doesn’t just teach this; He himself lived it. His whole life was one of service, ultimately culminating in His death on the cross. He did not seek to dominate but to heal, to teach, to give His life so that others might have life. For us, His followers, this means that if we want to be great in the eyes of God, we must imitate Christ’s humility. We must be willing to serve without seeking reward, to love without expecting anything in return, and to give ourselves in a way that lifts others up. Humble, loving service, then, is the path to true greatness in God’s Kingdom.Ā  This Sunday, we also celebrate World Mission Sunday, a reminder of the Church’s universal mission to proclaim the Gospel to all nations. The theme of service and humility ties beautifully into this celebration. The mission of the Church is not about imposing our will on others or seeking to expand power. Instead, it is about serving the world in love, sharing the Good News of salvation, and living out the example of Christ who gave His life for others.Ā  The call to mission is a call to follow Jesus in service and humility. Each of us, as baptized Christians, is sent to be a witness to Christ in the world. We are called to embody His love and humility, to go to the peripheries of society where people are suffering, neglected, or forgotten. On this World Mission Sunday, we are reminded that this mission is not just for priests, religious, or missionaries in distant lands—it is for all of us, right where we are. Whether in our families, workplaces, or communities, we are called to be servants, bringing Christ’s love to others. By following Jesus’ example and living it out, we thus partake in the Mission of the Church.Ā  But we ask ourselves, ā€œwhat does this humble service look like in our daily lives?ā€ Well, it may be as simple as listening to a friend who is going through a tough time, helping a colleague who is struggling, or reaching out to someone in need. It may also involve standing up for those who are marginalized, advocating for justice, and working to alleviate the suffering of others. Every act of kindness, every gesture of love, every moment we give ourselves to others in Christ’s name becomes a participation in the Church’s mission to the world.Ā  As we continue to ponder and reflect on these readings and celebrate World Mission Sunday, we are reminded that following Jesus means embracing a life of service and humility. It is through this service that we participate in the mission of the Church and reflect the love of Christ to the world. Let us ask for the grace to serve with humble hearts, to love as Christ loved, and to go out into the world, carrying the Good News not just in our words but in the way we live our lives.Ā  In the end, the greatness that Jesus speaks of is not measured by how much we accomplish in the eyes of the world, but by how much we have loved and served in the spirit of Christ. May we, as His disciples, strive to serve with humility and love, joining in the Church’s mission to bring the Gospel to all people, especially the least, the last, and the lost.   Homily delivered by Fr. Mamert MaƱus, SJ 29th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Anticipated Mass) 19 October 2024 Cenacle Retreat House Ā 

General, Homilies, Homily, Soul Food

Mark 10: 2-16

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā  Have you seen wedding videos of arranged marriages? There was one I saw where a young Indian groom sat alone, unsmiling & uncomfortable. His heavily veiled wife was led in to be seated beside him. Apparently, they’d never seen each other because when the bride was unveiled, the groom saw how exquisitely beautiful she was. With his huge sigh of relief came a blissful smile that erased every trace of anxiety on the groom’s face. Sadly, that was a one-off. In the rest of the videos I saw after that, brides & grooms looked like they’d rather be in Jupiter than in that wedding! In first century Israel, love didn’t have anything to do w/ marriage. For financial security of the bride, yes; peace between families & tribes, yes; keep wealth within the clan, yes. Love, no. Actually, it’s still that way in many, many cultures to this day. But in Israel back in Jesus’ day, the grooms’ families were always the wealthier. So, the privilege to file a bill of divorce was skewed towards the men. True enough, Jewish husbands divorced their wives even for the flimsiest of reasons. David Amram, noted scholar of Jewish marriage & divorce says, ā€œThis ancient right of the husband to divorce his wife at his pleasure (was) the central thought in the entire system of Jewish divorce law.ā€ He cites rabbinic teachings that say: ā€œ(Husband) may divorce (wife) if she spoiled a dish for him… or if he found another fairer than she… or if she goes out with her hair unbound…or if she talks so loudly in the house that neighbors could hear her.ā€ Weightier reasons were when the wife was suspected of adultery, or when she was unable to produce children. Being baog was always the woman’s fault back then. Upon divorce, women didn’t get their dowry back. Worse, they lost all financial security. This plunged her & her family into debt & poverty. Divorced women were so stigmatized that they actually died social deaths. When the Pharisees asked Jesus whether divorce was lawful or not (after all, the sacred law of Moses allowed it!) Jesus was flatly against it. Marriage involved not just a couple & their two families, but also God. It was bad enough that the Law permitting divorce privileged men but brutally prejudiced women. It was worse that love had nothing to do with marriage. Let me share something with you, sisters & brothers. There was actually a time when I was pretty sure love had nothing to do w/ my own mom & dad staying together. For a particular stretch of my life, they quarreled so much that kuya & I had to step in, esp. when their cold war dragged on for too long. We were still in high school, then, can you imagine? Already playing marriage counselors & arbiters. One time it got really bad. Our parents called for a family meeting. They announced, ā€œWe’re going on a trial separation.ā€ Separation was precisely what kuya & I were trying to prevent by helping them reconcile each time. So, the word ā€œtrialā€ didn’t quite make ā€œseparationā€ sound better. I confess, the first thought in my head was, ā€œWhat if my classmates find out? How would I live w/ the shame of being a child of separated parents, a ā€˜broken home’ (as it was called back then)?ā€ Then, the even darker scenarios: ā€œAm I losing my dad to someone else? Another family? Don’t they love us anymore?ā€ At dahil nga bahagi na kami ni kuya ng pagsasaayos ng mga bagay-bagay tuwing nag-aaway sila, at that moment, we felt like we failed in our mission. Kuya& I were not used to failure. We were very good students in school, oh my God. But now that mom & dad decided on a ā€œtrial separation,ā€ there was no greater failure. But this homily is not about my stand on the question: ā€œIs it lawful for a husband to divorce his wife?ā€ It is, nevertheless, a respectful suggestion, or an encouragement, perhaps. Just as there should be serious, compelling, & selfless reasons for couples to jump out of marriage, there should be even more serious, compelling, & selfless reasons to enter into one. I wish & hope & pray that couples think long & hard, far & wide about how they will be affecting the children in all their decisions not just as parents, but also as husbands & wives. And to do all this not just before having children, but before even getting married. In my opinion, the most serious, compelling, & selfless reason to consider should be the children. Jesuits have been in the education apostolate for a long, long time. We’ve seen it far too often to deny it, sisters & brothers. Problems of students often redound to marital problems of their parents. Not all, thank God. Not all. For there are indeed children who fall into problems even when their parents are in an exemplary marriage. Still, it has happened far too often to be denied, & happens still: there’s that higher risk of academic difficulties, disruptive behavior, & depression in children whose parents cannot & do not want to get along. Even when each parent tries to show the children parental love, the children see & feel & know that their parents no longer respect each other. Totoo pa rin ā€˜yung kasabihan: one of the best ways parents ever love their kids is to show them how much they love each other. Because kids know. By God’s grace, things got a little better w/ mom & dad as they grew older. It was never perfect. But stay together they did, till death parted them when mom passed. Did love for each other have anything to do with sticking together? I’m not really sure. But I will bet my last bag of Cheetos that if there was one thing that had everything to do with their having stuck it out together, it was love

General, Homilies, Homily, Soul Food

ā€œHinay-hinay, basta kanunay.ā€

To Pray on and Ponder: John 12, 24-26 ā€œHinay-hinay, basta kanunayā€ is a favorite Visayan-language quotation which I always liken to God’s grace. The dynamic movement is that of a slow, gentle drop of things, slowly, but constantly, like St. Ignatius’ image consoling grace—like water dripping on a sponge, it drips and drops, without noise, almost imperceptibly, slowly but surely. But we know that such water dripping hinay-hinay, basta kanunay would ultimately break the proverbial rock, rather than a one time, big time, noisy splash. I thought of this slow, gentle, relentless drop of things mulling over St. ThĆ©rĆØse, the foundress-saint we honor today. A big part of this slow and gentle drop of things in the spirit of St. ThĆ©rĆØse is her contemplation of the sweet and gentle goodness of God in all things. She saw goodness as though it were a golden stamp from the Creator that sealed goodness in every creature of God, even in the chair or kneeler she was using. But we see how this slow, gentle, relentless drop of things, assumes much depth when we come to know that the constant surrender to grace involved ThĆ©rĆØse’ gracious receiving of suffering from people around her, (some of whom are Jesuits: hmp, sorry po!). With much humility and grace, your foundress received humiliation and suffering and used these with the intention of purifying the world of sin’s hold of it. This is at the very heart of the ā€œlaw of the crossā€ as Jesuit theologian, Bernard Lonergan describes it. That in Jesus’ loving self-sacrifice on the cross, he took upon himself the sin and violence around him and transmuted it into obedient loving surrender to his Father’s will and loving self-sacrifice for the people he loved. This cross of Christ, wherever it is lived and embraced always leaves a world closer to redemption and communion with the loving God, hinay-hinay, basta kanunay. I believe St. ThĆ©rĆØse learned this by suffering it and experiencing deep joy for it. She herself testifies: Oh! If people could understand beforehand the sweetness and the peace enjoyed by those who would hold nothing back from the Good God! How he communicates himself to the soul who sincerely seeks him and who knows how to surrender herself. Let them just experience it, and they will see that therein is found the true happiness which they are vainly seeking elsewhere.Ā  (To Surrender Oneself, 1864) St. Ignatius once described the Jesuit of his dreams in similar terms: ā€œmen crucified to the world, and to whom the world itself is crucified.ā€ That by our gentle acts in ministry, we join Jesus Christ chipping away at sin and corruption in the world, crucifying it, really; but by sheer counterflow in things, we, ourselves are crucified to the world as well, going countercurrent to the world’s desires will always invite a backlash, but we continue chipping away anyways. And it will bear fruit as the Gospel proclaims—“Truly, truly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. This morning, I kept marveling at how the slowness and gentleness in St. ThĆ©rĆØseĀ learned her surrender to grace in the face of all the humiliation and suffering her commitment entailed, and how she ultimately experienced joy and peace as she gave her all to her Lord. And I guess the key is still the ever-growing love she kept in her heart for Jesus, and the way she ultimately contemplated the face of Jesus’ goodness in everything, hinay-hinay basta kanunay. And you know the grace of the founder sure is the grace of the daughters. I think of the Cenacle sisters close to me, and I see this slow and gentle drop of things reflected well in their lives, and I’m in awe at beholding God’s fidelity and constancy in them, in their friendship and their service. In them we see a God who always provides all of us with the grace we precisely need in our lives time and time again, with great hospitality and thoughtful gentleness and reliable strength, trully, really, hinay-hinay, basta kanunay! Homily delivered by Fr Vic Baltazar, SJ on the Feast of Saint ThĆØrĆ©se Couderc, Founder of the Religious of the Cenacle 26 September 2024 Cenacle Retreat House

Scroll to Top